Skip to content

Integrations · Coming soon

Jira

Planned, not built. The intended shape, and the honest answer about what works today.

acme/api · Issue #482LIVE
Handle expired refresh tokens

Return a typed error, add regression coverage, and update the authentication guide.

developerzbugauth

developerz-bot I've mapped this to session.ts and two integration tests. Estimated cost: $1.42.

Audited end to endGitHub-native workflowExisting checks stay in controlCost visible per task

Mirror qualified issues into a Jira project

For teams whose work lives in Jira rather than in GitHub Issues, the plan is the same narrow contract as Linear: create the Jira issue when the agent qualifies a GitHub issue, carry the labels across, and keep the status in step through handoff, escalation and close. It is not built. Until it is, the REST API and outbound webhooks expose the same events, so a small script gets you there without waiting for us.

Project and issue-type mapping

A qualified issue would land in the project you nominate, as the issue type you nominate — no opinionated schema of ours.

Two-way status, one direction of truth

The repository stays the source of truth for the work; Jira reflects it. Mirrors that fight each other help nobody.

Available today instead

Consume the outbound webhook events and call the Jira REST API — the same events the built-in sync would use.

Next step

What qualifies, what escalates and what merges is your policy file — the tracker only reflects those decisions.

Read the .maintainer.yml reference

Put a fleet of AI developers to work

Bring your own keys and your own boxes, drop a .maintainer.yml, and let the loops run — audited end to end. Access is invite-only.